Open Access

Intelligent Cloud Framework for Privacy-Aware Financial Risk Assessment and Cybersecurity Resilience

Dr. Alex Mathew
Professor, Department of Cybersecurity, Bethany College, West Virginia, USA

Abstract

The increasing adoption of cloud computing in financial institutions has created opportunities for scalable risk analytics while simultaneously introducing significant challenges related to data privacy, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, and operational resilience. Financial organizations process highly sensitive information across distributed cloud environments, making traditional risk assessment and security mechanisms insufficient for detecting evolving threats and protecting confidential data. This research proposes an Intelligent Cloud Framework for Privacy-Aware Financial Risk Assessment and Cybersecurity Resilience that integrates artificial intelligence, machine learning, privacy-preserving analytics, continuous threat monitoring, and adaptive risk management within a secure cloud architecture. The proposed framework combines financial risk indicators, transaction behavior, cybersecurity events, identity information, and infrastructure telemetry to develop dynamic risk profiles. Privacy-aware mechanisms, including data minimization, encryption, access control, federated learning, and differential privacy, are incorporated to reduce unnecessary exposure of sensitive information. Machine learning models are employed to identify anomalous financial behavior and cyber threats, while explainable AI supports transparent risk decisions. A continuous resilience layer enables adaptive response, recovery, and risk recalibration when security incidents occur. The framework is designed to provide scalable, intelligent, and privacy-conscious financial risk assessment while strengthening cybersecurity resilience across cloud-based financial ecosystems. The expected contribution is an integrated architecture that balances predictive intelligence, privacy protection, regulatory governance, and operational continuity.

Keywords

DOI

PDF Download

pdf

Publication Information

JournalInternational Research Journal of Innovative Engineering
Volume10
Number1
Pages18358-18366
Published2026-01-15
IssueVol. 10 No. 1 (2026): International Research Journal of Innovative Engineering (IRJIE)

References

1. Roman, R., Lopez, J., & Mambo, M. (2018). Mobile edge computing, Fog et al.: A survey and analysis of security threats and challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 680–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.11.009
2. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1175–1191). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982
3. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. y. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282). PMLR.
4. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298981
5. Tyagi, N. (2025). Privacy preserving AI in financial sector-balancing utility, security and compliance. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 8(5), 12795–12802.
6. Boeckl, K., & Lefkovitz, N. (2020). NIST privacy framework: A tool for improving privacy through enterprise risk management, Version 1.0. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.10
7. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity, Version 1.1. U.S. Department of Commerce.
8. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations (NIST Special Publication 800-53, Revision 5).
9. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D’Oliveira, B., Eichner, H., El Rouayheb, S., Evans, D., Gardner, M. J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., ... Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083
10. Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X., & He, B. (2023). A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4), 3347–3366. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3124599
11. Tabassi, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
12. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2023). ENISA threat landscape 2023. ENISA.
13. IBM Security. (2024). Cost of a data breach report 2024. IBM.
14. World Economic Forum. (2025). Global cybersecurity outlook 2025. World Economic Forum.
15. Autio, C., Schwartz, R., Dunietz, J., Jain, S., Stanley, M., Tabassi, E., Hall, P., & Roberts, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence risk management framework: Generative artificial intelligence profile (NIST AI 600-1). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1

Statistics

138
Views
79
Downloads